By Christopher Lord
A Democratic Audit of the ecu Union offers a scientific overview of democracy within the european opposed to truly outlined standards. Christopher Lord deals a double problem to generalizations a few democratic deficit within the ecu. at the one hand, it indicates that criteria of democratic functionality within the ecu might fluctuate throughout Union associations and decision-making approaches. nevertheless, it exhibits that they could differ throughout key dimensions of democratic governance, together with citizenship, rights, participation, illustration, responsiveness, transparency and responsibility.
Read or Download A Democratic Audit of the European Union (One Europe or Several?) PDF
Best diplomacy books
The Roman global used to be essentially a face-to-face tradition, the place it used to be anticipated that verbal exchange and negotiations will be performed in individual. this is often noticeable in Rome's contacts with different towns, states, and kingdoms - even if established, autonomous, pleasant or opposed - and within the improvement of a diplomatic behavior with its personal rhythms and protocols that coalesced right into a self-sustaining method of communique.
During this well timed file, a bipartisan staff of specialists concludes that the Islamic Republic is solidly entrenched and that the urgency of the worries round Irans regulations mandates that Washington care for the present regime instead of wait it out. the duty Forceco-chaired via former nationwide safety Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and previous Director of imperative Intelligence Robert M.
This ebook seeks to give an explanation for why vulnerable states exist in the overseas procedure. utilizing the instances of Armenia, St. Kitts and Nevis, Lebanon, and Cambodia, the writer argues that, if a country is susceptible and susceptible, then it will probably perform an unforeseen measure of relative autonomy unfettered through nice powers.
This publication explores new grounds that public international relations is coming into this day, as household publics come to the vanguard of the coverage – performing either as international coverage constituencies and public international relations actors cooperating with their overseas opposite numbers. the writer discusses the phenomena of public diplomacy’s household measurement defined as government’s skill to interact its personal society in overseas coverage practices via details, cooperation and identity-defining.
- Personal Diplomacy in the EU: Political Leadership and Critical Junctures of European Integration
- Beyond Paradise and Power: Europe, America, and the Future of a Troubled Partnership
- International Politics on the World Stage
- The diplomacy of pragmatism: Britain and the formation of NATO, 1942-1949
- Terrorism and the UN: Before and After September 11 (United Nations Intellectual History Project)
Extra info for A Democratic Audit of the European Union (One Europe or Several?)
Co-decision. The EP enjoys the same rights of amendment as above, but its powers of rejection are stronger. It can reject by an absolute majority of its membership at first reading or a simple majority of its membership at third reading. The Council cannot over-turn that rejection. ) Assent. The EP is able to reject but not amend. This applies, for example, to international Treaties signed by the EU. Second pillar procedures Common strategies are agreed by heads of government in the European Council on proposals framed by their foreign ministers.
The President of the Commission should be selected by Heads of Govt 7. EP should elect President of the Commission h ld l B. Acceptance of joint decision-making 3. Number of issue areas (max 27) where majority accept joint decision-making A. Feelings of identity 1. Index of Feeling of Europeanness (0–1)1 2.
Public control at least discourages those who hold office from acting only on their personal preferences without any attempt to anticipate the needs and values of citizens. Political equality at least means that each person’s preference has the same weight in the whole. The decision-rule ‘one person, one vote’ re-weights public decisions away from private distributions of power and resources. Deliberative standards fairly applied allow all points of view an opportunity to be argued towards a winning position, regardless of the initial number of their proponents.